RRAP State Bridges - Output Analysis

Metadata also available as

Metadata:

Identification_Information:
Citation:
Citation_Information:
Publication_Date: 20190822
Title: RRAP State Bridges - Output Analysis
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Other_Citation_Details:
Resiliency Assessment - Washington State Transportation Systems Created by CISA Region 10 This data was provided from the bridge seismic screening tool created as part of the resiliency assessment referenced above.
Description:
Abstract:
The 2,717 state highway bridges incorporated into this study from the WSDOT bridge inventory database were assessed using the BSST analysis methodology detailed previously in this report. Results consist of three types of outcomes: Bridge Damage Levels and Types, Bridge Repair Types, and Bridge Reopening Times. All output is a part of this feature class. Bridge damage types are projected on the basis of both damage level (None, Moderate, Significant), whether a bridge is a special bridge type, and also the types of damage that the bridge will experience (including both direct seismic and secondary earthquake-induced impacts); The projected repair types and reopening times necessary to bring bridges back to a minimum level of functionality that enables their use for emergency response were computed using the methodology specified in the Bridge Reopening Times section. Refer to the BSST Technical Report. The BSST was developed to assess the potential impacts of a CSZ earthquake to highway bridges in Washington State at a system-level as part of the Washington State Transportation Systems RRAP project. The results provided identify the Damage Levels, Damage Types, Repair Types and Reopening Times associated with 2,717 bridges located in Western and Central Washington that were evaluated for this RRAP project. Understanding that this analysis likely constitutes a “worst-case scenario” with respect to bridge damage, the results nonetheless project that the majority of bridges in Washington State will experience moderate to significant damage resulting from a CSZ earthquake. While the majority of bridges that experience damage could be reopened within one year of the earthquake, a substantial number of those bridges (28.7 percent) are projected to take more than a year to reopen—in many cases 2 or more years. The results also project that while many bridges may be reopened after either minor repairs/inspections or the construction of a temporary bypass road, a substantial number of more significantly damaged bridges (797 structures) span bodies of water and will require complete replacement prior to reopening. This suggests that significant gains in roadway corridor reopening times could be gained by focusing on retrofits or upgrades to these more vulnerable bridges that span rivers and other bodies of water. This tool is primarily intended to inform regional highway prioritization for emergency response activities; however, the BSST provides a useful evaluation methodology that could be applied to other regional emergency preparedness and infrastructure assessment studies. This could include studies of bridge infrastructure to other potential seismic events within the region, or at varying jurisdictional levels (i.e., county, local). The BSST also uses currently available seismic, seismically-induced secondary hazard and infrastructure information. As new seismic information becomes available, or as secondary-hazards (e.g., landslides, avalanches) become characterized more comprehensively, such information could be integrated into the current BSST methodology. Similarly, as seismic retrofit activities or other infrastructure improvement projects continue throughout Washington State, or as new infrastructure are built, it will be important that the infrastructure data integrated in the BSST also be updated periodically. Doing so will ensure that planners and infrastructure managers maintain the most current and complete understanding of the network-level seismic risks of a CSZ event to Washington State highways.Please note that all results from the BSST are based on a model and information received from WSDOT. Damages from an earthquake may be different that what is provided here. Liquefaction data was used within the BSST tool. WADNR is the source for liquefaction data and is available here: https://www.dnr.wa.gov/programs-and-services/geology/geologic-hazards/geologic-hazard-maps#nehrp-site-class-and-liquefaction-susceptibilityUSGS ShakeMap was also used in the BSST tool for a M9.0 Cascadia earthquake and is available here: https://earthquake.usgs.gov/scenarios/eventpage/gllegacycasc9p0expanded_se/shakemap/pga. DHS distributed this data to WSDOT on August 22, 2019.
Purpose:
The Regional Resiliency Assessment Program (RRAP) is a cooperative assessment of specific critical infrastructure within a designated geographic area and a regional analysis of the surrounding infrastructure that addresses a range of infrastructure resilience issues that could have regionally and nationally significant consequences. In 2017, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) sponsored the Washington State Transportation Systems RRAP project in coordination with the Washington Emergency Management Division (EMD), Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), and other regional stakeholders. This project is focused on assessing the impacts of a Cascadia Subduction Zone (CSZ) earthquake on state transportation systems and, in particular, how those impacts may affect the ability of emergency response efforts to move supplies into the region. The intended outcome of this analysis is the prioritization of transportation routes and modes for additional planning, investment, hardening, or other activities to enhance their resilience—and therefore, to enhance their ability to support response and recovery efforts following a CSZ earthquake. An important part of this transportation system-level assessment has been to assess the seismic vulnerability of the state highway system. In doing so, the RRAP project team developed a Bridge Seismic Screening Tool (BSST) to assess, at a system-level, the potential impacts that a CSZ earthquake could have on state highway bridges. The first step in the BSST is to assess the seismic vulnerability of highway bridge infrastructure in Washington State following a CSZ earthquake to determine a projected or potential damage state. Damage states are then used to determine approximate reopening times for bridge crossings.
Status:
Progress: Complete
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: Unknown
Spatial_Domain:
Bounding_Coordinates:
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -124.626618
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -118.928820
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 49.020486
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 45.508704
Keywords:
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Theme_Keyword: Transportation
Theme_Keyword: Bridge
Theme_Keyword: State
Theme_Keyword: Washington
Theme_Keyword: Cascadia
Theme_Keyword: Damages
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: ISO 19115 Topic Categories
Theme_Keyword: transportation
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Place_Keyword: Washington
Place_Keyword: WA
Place_Keyword: State
Access_Constraints: None
Use_Constraints:
For Planning use only. The Washington State Department of Transportation shall not be liable for any activity involving these data, including, but not limited to, lost profits or savings or any other economic or consequential damages. Nor does the Department warrant the fitness of the data for use for a particular purpose, or the installation of the data, its use, or the results obtained.
Point_of_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: WSDOT Security and Emergency Operations
Contact_Person: John Himmel
Contact_Position: Emergency and Security Program Manager
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing
Address: PO Box 47358
City: Olympia
State_or_Province: WA
Postal_Code: 98504-7358
Country: US
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 360-705-7973
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: himmelj@wsdot.wa.gov
Data_Set_Credit:
Resiliency Assessment - Washington State Transportation Systems Created by CISA Region 10 This data was provided from the bridge seismic screening tool created as part of the resiliency assessment referenced above.
Native_Data_Set_Environment: Version 6.2 (Build 9200) ; Esri ArcGIS 10.6.1.9270
Data_Quality_Information:
Lineage:
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
WSDOT made the following changes to the data received from DHS. Projected the data from NAD 1983/2011 Contiguous USA Albers to NAD 1983 HARN State Plane Washington South US Feet. Added the RouteIdentifier field and populated it from the WSDOT Bridge Engineering Information System data. Added the StateRouteNumber, RelatedRouteType, and RelatedRouteQualifier fields and populated them from the RouteIdentifier field. The RouteIdentifier field includes local route numbers. Records with local route numbers do not have associated state route numbers, related route types, or related route qualifiers.
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: WSDOT TDGMO
Contact_Person: Stacey Plumley
Contact_Position: GIS Analyst
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing
Address: PO Box 47384
City: Olympia
State_or_Province: WA
Postal_Code: 98504-7384
Country: US
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 360-596-8923
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: plumls@wsdot.wa.gov
Spatial_Data_Organization_Information:
Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method: Vector
Point_and_Vector_Object_Information:
SDTS_Terms_Description:
SDTS_Point_and_Vector_Object_Type: Entity point
Point_and_Vector_Object_Count: 5434
Spatial_Reference_Information:
Horizontal_Coordinate_System_Definition:
Planar:
Map_Projection:
Map_Projection_Name: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Washington South FIPS 4602 Feet
Lambert_Conformal_Conic:
Standard_Parallel: 45.83333333333334
Standard_Parallel: 47.33333333333334
Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -120.5
Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 45.33333333333334
False_Easting: 1640416.666666667
False_Northing: 0.0
Planar_Coordinate_Information:
Planar_Coordinate_Encoding_Method: coordinate pair
Coordinate_Representation:
Abscissa_Resolution: 0.0003280833333333333
Ordinate_Resolution: 0.0003280833333333333
Planar_Distance_Units: foot_us
Geodetic_Model:
Horizontal_Datum_Name: D North American 1983 HARN
Ellipsoid_Name: GRS 1980
Semi-major_Axis: 6378137.0
Denominator_of_Flattening_Ratio: 298.257222101
Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
Detailed_Description:
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: EOCEdit.DBO.WRRAP_StateBridges_new
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: OBJECTID
Attribute_Definition: Internal feature number.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Esri
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain:
Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: StateStructureID
Attribute_Definition:
Unique identifier for each structure/bridge in the state, and once established this can never change for the life of the structure/bridge. When a new bridge replaces an old bridge, a new unique structure identifier must be coded. The old identifier cannot be recycled.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: RepairTimeDays
Attribute_Definition:
All bridge vulnerability and potential-damage analysis is ultimately used to inform the determination of an approximate bridge reopening time for each structure following a full-length rupture of the CSZ fault. Bridge reopening time is different from bridge repair time or restoration time; reopening time refers to the amount of time required to repair a bridge crossing to a minimum functional state of repair sufficient to support the movement of emergency response vehicles. It does not necessarily refer to complete restoration to a pre-event state of repair. The estimated reopening times include the time necessary to perform a bridge damage inspection, bridge rehabilitation or bridge replacement, or to construct a temporary road to bypass the bridge. Bridge reopening times were determined in collaboration with the WSDOT bridge engineers on the basis of damage criteria, bridge length, and repair type, See the Technical Report for Repair Times.
Attribute_Definition_Source:
Washington RRAP Bridge Seismic Screening Tool Tehcnical Report, May 2019
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Shape
Attribute_Definition: Feature geometry.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Esri
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Coordinates defining the features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: DamageType
Attribute_Definition:
Bridge damage types are projected on the basis of both damage level (None, Moderate, Significant), whether a bridge is a special bridge type, and also the types of damage that the bridge will experience (including both direct seismic and secondary earthquake-induced impacts). Damage types are calculated from the BSST Tool and are defined below. Damage Level: None Damage Level Moderate: Seismic demand exceeds minimum PGA, which can damage bridges but is less than bridge's seismic design capacity. Seismic demand exceeds bridge’s seismic design capacity, but bridge damage is lessened because bridge has pier walls. Seismic demand exceeds bridge’s seismic design capacity, but bridge damage is lessened because bridge is single-span. Damage Level Significant: Bridge damaged owing to hollow core piles. Bridge damaged owing to hollow core piles, and soil liquefaction occurs at bridge location. Soil liquefaction occurs at bridge location. Seismic demand exceeds minimum PGA, which can damage bridges but is less than bridge's seismic design capacity, and soil liquefaction occurs at bridge location. Seismic demand exceeds bridge’s seismic design capacity. Seismic demand exceeds bridge’s seismic design capacity and soil liquefaction occurs at bridge location. Seismic demand exceeds bridge’s seismic design capacity, soil liquefaction occurs at bridge location, and bridge is damaged by significant bridge scour occurring during tsunami following CSZ earthquake. Seismic demand exceeds bridge’s seismic design capacity and bridge is damaged by significant bridge scour occurring during tsunami following CSZ earthquake. Seismic demand exceeds bridge’s seismic design capacity, but bridge damage is lessened because bridge has pier walls, and soil liquefaction occurs at bridge location. Seismic demand exceeds bridge’s seismic design capacity, but bridge damage is lessened because bridge has pier walls, and bridge is damaged by significant bridge scour occurring during tsunami following CSZ earthquake. Seismic demand exceeds bridge’s seismic design capacity, but bridge damage is lessened because bridge is single-span, and soil liquefaction occurs at bridge location. Seismic demand exceeds bridge’s seismic design capacity, but bridge damage is lessened because bridge is single-span, soil liquefaction occurs at bridge location, and bridge is damaged by significant bridge scour occurring during tsunami following CSZ earthquake. Damage Level Special: Seismic performance of special bridges not assessed. Seismic performance of special bridges not assessed and soil liquefaction occurs at bridge location. Seismic performance of special bridges not assessed, soil liquefaction occurs at bridge location, and bridge is damaged by significant bridge scour occurring during tsunami following CSZ earthquake Damage Types Include: Hollow Core/Liquefaction Liquefaction Min PGA Min GPA/Liquefaction PGA PGA/Liquefaction PGA/Liquefaction/Scour PGA Pure Wall PGA Pure Wall/Liquefaction PGA Pure Wall/Liquefaction/Scour PGA Single Span PGA Single Span/Liquefaction PGA Single Span/Liquefaction/Scour Special Special/Liquefaction Special/Liquefaction/Scour None
Attribute_Definition_Source:
Washington RRAP Bridge Seismic Screening Tool Tehcnical Report, May 2019
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Min_PGA
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Minimum PGA
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: PGA from USGS ShakeMap
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: PGA_and_Liquefaction
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: PGA and Liquefaction
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: PGA from USGS ShakeMap and WADNR
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Min_PGA_and_Liqufaction
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Min PGA/Liquefaction
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: PGA from USGS ShakeMap and WADNR
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: PGA
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: PGA
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: PGA from USGS ShakeMap
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: PGA_PW_and_Liquefaction_and_Scour
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: PGA Pier Wall/Liquefaction/Scour
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source:
PGA from USGS ShakeMap, Liqufaction from WADNR, and Pier Wall andScour from WSDOT.
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Special_and_Liquefaction_and_Scour
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Special bridge, liquefaction, and scour
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: WSDOT, WADNR
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: PGA_SS_and_Liquefaction
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: PGA Single Span/Liquefaction
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source:
PGA from USGS ShakeMap, Liquefaction from WADNR and Single Span from WSDOT.
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: PGA_SS
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: PGA Single Span
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: PGA from USGS ShakeMap and Single Span from WSDOT.
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Liquefaction
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Liquefaction
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: WADNR
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: PGA_and_Liquefaction_and_Scour
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: PGA, Liquefaction, and Scour
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source:
PGA from USGS ShakeMap, Liqufaction from WADNR, and Scour from WSDOT.
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: PGA_SS_and_Liquefaction_and_Scour
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: PGA Single Span/Liquefaction/Scour
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source:
PGA from USGS ShakeMap, Liquefaction from WADNR and Single Span and Scour from WSDOT.
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: PGA_PW
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: PGA Pier Wall
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: PGA from USGS ShakeMap and Pier Wall from WSDOT.
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: None
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: No Damage
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: BSST Tool
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Special
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Special bridges denoted by WSDOT
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: WSDOT
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Hollow_Core_and_Liquefaction
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Hollow Core/Liquefaction
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: WSDOT
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Special_and_Liquefaction
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Special bridges and liquefaction
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: WSDOT, WADNR
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: PGA_PW_and_Liquefaction
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: PGA_Pier Wall/Liquefaction
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source:
PGA from USGS ShakeMap, Liqufaction from WADNR, and Pier Wall from WSDOT.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: RepairType
Attribute_Definition:
All bridge vulnerability and potential-damage analysis is ultimately used to inform the determination of an approximate bridge reopening time for each structure following a full-length rupture of the CSZ fault. Bridge reopening time is different from bridge repair time or restoration time; reopening time refers to the amount of time required to repair a bridge crossing to a minimum functional state of repair sufficient to support the movement of emergency response vehicles. It does not necessarily refer to complete restoration to a pre-event state of repair. The estimated reopening times include the time necessary to perform a bridge damage inspection, bridge rehabilitation or bridge replacement, or to construct a temporary road to bypass the bridge. Bridge reopening times were determined in collaboration with the WSDOT bridge engineers on the basis of damage criteria, bridge length, and repair type, See the Technical Report for Repair Types. Bridge Repair Type Categories include: Moderate New Bridge over impassible geography New Bridge over impassible geography with subsurface strengthening New Bridge over water New Bridge over water with subsurface strengthening None Temporary Road
Attribute_Definition_Source:
Washington RRAP Bridge Seismic Screening Tool Tehcnical Report, May 2019
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Moderate
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Moderate Damage
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source:
Washington RRAP Bridge Seismic Screening Tool Tehcnical Report, May 2019
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: None
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: None
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source:
Washington RRAP Bridge Seismic Screening Tool Tehcnical Report, May 2019
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Temp
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: Temporary
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source:
Washington RRAP Bridge Seismic Screening Tool Tehcnical Report, May 2019
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value:
New_Bridge_Over_Impassible_Geograph_ with_Subsurface_Strengthening
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
New Bridge: Over Impassible Geography with Subsurface Strengthening
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source:
Washington RRAP Bridge Seismic Screening Tool Tehcnical Report, May 2019
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: New_Special_Bridge
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: New Special Bridge
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source:
Washington RRAP Bridge Seismic Screening Tool Tehcnical Report, May 2019
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: New_Bridge_Over_Impassible_Geography
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: New Bridge: Over Impassible Geography
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source:
Washington RRAP Bridge Seismic Screening Tool Tehcnical Report, May 2019
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: New_Bridge_Over_Water_with_Subsurface_Strengthening
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: New Bridge: Over Water with Subsurface Strengthening
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source:
Washington RRAP Bridge Seismic Screening Tool Tehcnical Report, May 2019
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: New_Bridge_Over_Water
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: New Bridge: Over Water
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source:
Washington RRAP Bridge Seismic Screening Tool Tehcnical Report, May 2019
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Latitude
Attribute_Definition:
Latitude is a north-south measurement of position on the Earth. It is defined by the angle measured from a horizontal plane located at the Earth's center that is perpendicular to the polar axis. A line connecting all places of the same latitude is termed a parallel. Latitude is commonly, but not exclusively, measured in degrees, minutes, and seconds. Measurements of latitude range from 0° (at the Equator) to 90° North (90.0) or South (-90.0).
Attribute_Definition_Source: WSDOT Application - DOTS
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Longitude
Attribute_Definition:
Longitude is a west-east measurement of position on the Earth. It is the angle measured from a vertical plane running through the polar axis and the prime meridian at Greenwich, UK. A line connecting all places of the same longitude is termed a meridian. Longitude is commonly, but not exclusively, measured in degrees, minutes, and seconds. Measurements of longitude range from 0° (Prime Meridian) to 180° West (-180.0) or 180° East (180.0) from this point.
Attribute_Definition_Source: WSDOT Application - DOTS
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: InitialDamage
Attribute_Definition:
Initial Damage was calculated from the BSST Tool and is shown as no damage, moderate damage, and significant damage. Definitions are below. No Bridge Damage - Bridges identified as suffering neither significant nor moderate damage are assumed to sustain no structural damage during the CSZ earthquake scenario and thus assumed to not require any repairs prior to reopening. These bridges may suffer minor surface cracking. Moderate Bridge Damage - Bridges identified as suffering moderate damage of at least one damage type and not identified as suffering significant damage of any of the potential damage types are assumed to be moderately damaged following the CSZ earthquake scenario and related geological hazards. For such bridges, it is assumed that a bridge damage inspection would be necessary prior to reopening, but that limited or no bridge repairs would be required. Furthermore, it is assumed that the bridge inspection and any necessary repairs would require 2 weeks to complete, after which time the bridge would be reopened. Significant Bridge Damage - Bridges identified as suffering significant damage are evaluated within the BSST to determine the amount of time required to either repair or replace the bridge, or to build a temporary road that bypasses the bridge, if possible. Bridges suffering significant damage are considered damaged to such an extent that major bridge rehabilitation, partial rebuild, or complete rebuild would be necessary. Given the extensive time required for such work, the construction of temporary roadways to replace bridges when possible was deemed preferential in the BSST methodology. If it was determined that a temporary roadway could not be constructed, the bridge rehabilitation or replacement time was determined as a function of bridge length and considerations of any subsurface strengthening necessary to improve liquefied soils at the bridge location. Special Bridges - Used to specify bridges whose vulnerability and expected damage are atypical, and thus not amenable to standardized analysis. As such, bridges identified in this sheet are a subset of those listed in the master “RoadBridges” worksheet, and are excluded from the BSST analysis.
Attribute_Definition_Source:
Washington RRAP Bridge Seismic Screening Tool Tehcnical Report, May 2019
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Significant
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Bridges identified as suffering significant damage are evaluated within the BSST to determine the amount of time required to either repair or replace the bridge, or to build a temporary road that bypasses the bridge, if possible. Bridges suffering significant damage are considered damaged to such an extent that major bridge rehabilitation, partial rebuild, or complete rebuild would be necessary. Given the extensive time required for such work, the construction of temporary roadways to replace bridges when possible was deemed preferential in the BSST methodology. If it was determined that a temporary roadway could not be constructed, the bridge rehabilitation or replacement time was determined as a function of bridge length and considerations of any subsurface strengthening necessary to improve liquefied soils at the bridge location.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source:
Washington RRAP Bridge Seismic Screening Tool Tehcnical Report, May 2019
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Moderate
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Bridges identified as suffering moderate damage of at least one damage type and not identified as suffering significant damage of any of the potential damage types are assumed to be moderately damaged following the CSZ earthquake scenario and related geological hazards. For such bridges, it is assumed that a bridge damage inspection would be necessary prior to reopening, but that limited or no bridge repairs would be required. Furthermore, it is assumed that the bridge inspection and any necessary repairs would require 2 weeks to complete, after which time the bridge would be reopened.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source:
Washington RRAP Bridge Seismic Screening Tool Tehcnical Report, May 2019
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: None
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Bridges identified as suffering neither significant nor moderate damage are assumed to sustain no structural damage during the CSZ earthquake scenario and thus assumed to not require any repairs prior to reopening. These bridges may suffer minor surface cracking.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source:
Washington RRAP Bridge Seismic Screening Tool Tehcnical Report, May 2019
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: Special
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Used to specify bridges whose vulnerability and expected damage are atypical, and thus not amenable to standardized analysis. As such, bridges identified in this sheet are a subset of those listed in the master “RoadBridges” worksheet, and are excluded from the BSST analysis.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source:
Washington RRAP Bridge Seismic Screening Tool Tehcnical Report, May 2019
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: RouteIdentifier
Attribute_Definition:
A unique Route identifier to identify a route (City,County State, Tribal, Forest) in any given data set. For State Routes, Route IDs are assigned by WSDOT's GIS and Roadway Data Office
Attribute_Definition_Source: WSDOT Application - DOTS
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: StateRouteNumber
Attribute_Definition:
The number assigned to the State Route and enacted into law by the Washington State Legislature
Attribute_Definition_Source: WSDOT Application - DOTS
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: RelatedRouteType
Attribute_Definition:
A Code that represents a classification of a route associated with a mainline state route, examples include: Couplet, Spur, Alternate Route, etc. 
Attribute_Definition_Source: WSDOT Application - DOTS
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: RelatedRouteQualifier
Attribute_Definition:
A reference used to uniquely identify the physical location of the State Route Related Route Type. The State Route Related Route Qualifier can be based on a State Route Milepost, street name, city, or other distinguishing geographic reference.
Attribute_Definition_Source: WSDOT Application - DOTS
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: GlobalID
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: YearBuilt
Attribute_Definition:
Applicable Structure Types :
Bridges & culverts carrying public roadways Pedestrian, RR and other non-vehicular structures over public roadways Tunnels carrying public roadways within
Code all 4 digits of the year in which construction of the structure was completed. If the year built is unknown, code 1900. If the year built is earlier than 1900, code 1900.
Attribute_Definition_Source: Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: YearRebuilt
Attribute_Definition:
Applicable Structure Types: Bridges & culverts carrying public roadways Pedestrian, RR and other non-vehicular structures over public roadways Tunnels carrying public roadways within
For a structure to be defined as rebuilt, the type of work performed, whether or not it meets current minimum standards, must have been eligible for funding under any of the federal aid funding categories. The eligibility criteria would apply to the work performed regardless of whether all state or local funds or federal aid funds were used. Some types of work to be considered as rebuilt are widenings and retrofits designed to increase the original structural capacity. Some types of eligible work not to be considered as rebuilt are: • Safety feature replacement or upgrading (for example, bridge rail, approach guardrail or impact attenuators). • Painting of structural steel. • Overlay of bridge deck. • Utility work. • Emergency repair to restore structural integrity to the previous status following an accident. • Retrofitting to correct a deficiency which does not substantially alter physical geometry or increase the load-carrying capacity. • Work performed to keep a structure operational while plans for complete rehabilitation or replacement are under preparation (for example, adding a substructure element or extra girder).
Attribute_Definition_Source: Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual
Distribution_Information:
Distributor:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization:
Washington State Department of Transportation, Office of Information Technology
Contact_Person: Jordyn Mitchell
Contact_Position: GIS Database Administrator
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing
Address: PO Box 47430
City: Olympia
State_or_Province: WA
Postal_Code: 98504-7430
Country: US
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 360-705-7645
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: mitchejo@wsdot.wa.gov
Distribution_Liability: See access and use constraints information.
Standard_Order_Process:
Fees: none
Ordering_Instructions:
Download individual data sets from <http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/mapsdata/geodatacatalog/default.htm>
Metadata_Reference_Information:
Metadata_Date: 20191011
Metadata_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: WSDOT Security and Emergency Operations
Contact_Person: John Himmel
Contact_Position: Emergency and Security Program Manager
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing
Address: PO Box 47358
City: Olympia
State_or_Province: WA
Postal_Code: 98504-7358
Country: US
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 360-705-7973
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: himmelj@wsdot.wa.gov
Metadata_Standard_Name: FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001-1998
Metadata_Time_Convention: local time
Metadata_Use_Constraints:
For Planning use only. The Washington State Department of Transportation shall not be liable for any activity involving these data with regard to lost profits or savings or any other consequential damages; or the fitness for use of the data for a particular purpose; or the installation of the data, its use, or the results obtained.
Generated by mp version 2.9.12 on Fri Oct 11 14:13:03 2019