The objective of this study was to present criteria and procedures for evaluation of Joint Development (JD) above, below, or beside state highways. Application of the procedures are illustrated over a wide range of joint development situations, both (1) for establishing state or local JD policy, and (2) for making decisions about JD projects in a more timely and comprehensive manner, and in a way that will contribute toward improving the quality or urban life or the enhancement of rural environments. The approach taken in the Guidelines is sequential, systematic, and interdisciplinary; that is, it uses a series of successively more detailed and comprehensive planning and evaluation procedures for JD decision making, relying on a wide range of specified physical, economic, social, and legal criteria. In use, the Guidelines envision a three-stage planning and evaluation process: (1) identification of the need or potential for JD projects; (2) comparison of project proposals against policies, criteria, and standards designed to avoid or minimize negative impacts and increase favorable impacts; and (3) refined definition of costs and benefits when warranted.
June 22, 2007
Jack E. Van Zandt, et al.
Stanford Research Institute.
- # of Pages: 256 p., 9,818 KB (PDF)
- Subject: Accessibility, Cooperation, Decision making, Environmental impacts, Evaluation, Guidelines, Highway planning, Joint development, Land use planning, Multiple use, Multiple use planning, Redevelopment, Revenues, Strategic planning, Urban development.
- Keywords: Joint development, multiple use, highway planning, environmental impact.
- Related Publications: Guidelines for Joint Development on State Highway Transportation Ways, Interstate 5 Test Cases (Supplement), (WA-RD 2.1A).
This abstract was last modified April 29, 2008